TL;DR
- AI agents are moving from generating website copy to actually editing and maintaining websites.
- WordPress blocks give agents a structured content model they can understand and modify directly.
- Page builders like Elementor store much of their layout inside a vendor-specific document structure, which adds another interpretation layer for AI.
- Elementor is responding with its own AI agent and MCP capabilities, so this is not a simple “AI cannot edit Elementor” argument.
- For a new service-business or marketing website, we would now default to a block-first architecture.
- Existing Elementor sites do not automatically need rebuilding. Migration only makes sense when the operational benefit justifies the cost.
1. The Website Changed. The Architecture Didn’t
For years, the question when building a WordPress site was simple:
Can the marketing team edit it without calling a developer?
That is one reason page builders became so popular.
Elementor, Divi, and similar tools gave people a visual canvas. Drag this section. Move that headline. Add a button. See the result immediately.
They solved a real problem.
But there is now another user we need to design for.
AI.
Not AI that writes a paragraph and hands it to someone.
AI that can eventually:
Update a service page.
Change an offer.
Add a location.
Refresh an FAQ.
Rewrite a headline.
Publish content.
That is a different problem.
And it changes what “easy to edit” actually means.
2. AI Works Better When the Website Has Structure
WordPress blocks are structured.
A heading is a heading.
A button is a button.
A paragraph is a paragraph.
A group of content is a group.
An AI agent can look at that structure and understand what it is working with.
If the instruction is:
Change the headline on the plumbing services page.
The agent does not need to reconstruct the whole page.
It can change the heading block.
That sounds like a small difference.
At scale, it is not.
Because once AI starts maintaining websites continuously, predictable structure becomes operational infrastructure.
3. Page Builders Added Their Own Language
Page builders work differently.
Elementor, for example, stores its layout using its own JSON-based document structure inside WordPress.
That is perfectly workable when Elementor itself is doing the editing.
But now the AI needs to understand Elementor’s representation of the page before it can safely change the page.
That creates another layer.
Core WordPress understands blocks.
Elementor understands Elementor.
An AI system working with Elementor either needs an Elementor-aware integration or has to interpret that proprietary structure correctly.
And Elementor clearly sees the same shift happening.
It already has Angie, its AI agent, and it is working on MCP capabilities designed to let AI tools interact more directly with Elementor sites.
So this is not about Elementor being “anti-AI.”
It is about architecture.
Do you want AI editability to depend mainly on WordPress’s native content structure, or on another vendor’s interpretation layer?
For a complicated site, that may be a reasonable tradeoff.
For a six-page service-business website, it may be unnecessary complexity.
4. Not Every WordPress Site Should Be Built the Same Way
This is where the discussion usually goes off the rails.
A plumbing company website and an online marketplace are both technically “WordPress sites.”
They are not remotely the same system.
A typical marketing site might have:
Home.
Services.
Locations.
About.
FAQs.
Contact.
Blog content.
Lead forms.
That is mostly structured content.
A directory, portal, marketplace, membership site, or community is different. Those systems need data models, permissions, search, filtering, ranking logic, accounts, workflows, and application functionality.
For those projects, the theme is only one piece of the architecture.
But if the job is essentially:
Explain the business, build trust, capture the lead.
You probably do not need application-level complexity inside the page editor.
5. What We Would Build Today
For a new marketing website in 2026, our starting point would be simple.
Use a block-first WordPress architecture.
Keep page content in native blocks.
Use reusable patterns for common sections.
Choose one form system.
Choose one SEO system.
Add AI access only where the workflow actually needs it.
WordPress itself is moving in this direction.
Recent WordPress releases added the AI Client, Connectors infrastructure, the Abilities API, and an official MCP Adapter that can expose WordPress capabilities to AI systems.
That matters because AI is starting to become part of the operating layer of the CMS.
The goal is not to install ten AI plugins.
The goal is to make the website understandable to both humans and software.
6. Should You Rebuild an Existing Elementor Site?
Not automatically.
This is where architecture discussions can become expensive very quickly.
If you already have a simple Elementor site with a handful of pages and you are planning to automate frequent content changes, rebuilding those pages with blocks may make sense.
If you have 80 carefully designed landing pages that rarely change, the economics may point in the opposite direction.
If Elementor has become the front end for a directory, membership system, or some custom business process, ripping it out first may be exactly the wrong move.
Move the structured data into the right architecture.
Separate the application logic.
Then decide whether rebuilding the marketing pages is worth it.
The right answer is not:
Blocks good. Elementor bad.
The right question is:
What will this website need to do over the next few years, and which architecture makes that work easier to operate?
Read the full article: Why Block Themes Beat Page Builders for AI-Ready WordPress Sites →
The full article goes deeper into WordPress 7.1, MCP, Elementor’s AI direction, Twenty Twenty-Five, GeneratePress and Kadence, migration decisions, permissions, security, and the AI stack we would use on a new marketing website.
7. The Test We Would Use
There is a simple test for a new marketing site.
Ask:
Can an AI agent change the headline on this page without pretending to be a human clicking through a visual builder?
Then ask the human version:
If the AI gets it wrong, can someone open WordPress, understand the page structure, review the change, and fix it without depending on a proprietary editing canvas?
And one more:
Can we control exactly what the agent is allowed to change?
If the answers are yes, the architecture is probably headed in the right direction
Final Thought
Page builders solved an important problem.
They made websites easier for humans to edit.
But the next generation of websites will increasingly be maintained by humans and AI agents.
That changes the design requirement.
The best website architecture may not be the one with the fanciest visual editor.
It may be the one where both the human and the machine can clearly understand what they are looking at.
Structure is becoming part of AI readiness.
Thanks for reading Signal Over Noise,
where we separate real business signal from AI noise.
where we separate real business signal from AI noise.
See you next Tuesday,
Avi Kumar
Founder: Kuware.com
Subscribe Link: https://kuware.com/newsletter/